Samsung appears to be taking a more committed approach toward its in house processors for 2027. Recent reports indicate that the company plans to increase the share of Exynos chips in the Galaxy S27 lineup, mainly to cut down its reliance on Qualcomm. The reason is quite clear, Snapdragon processors are becoming increasingly expensive. For the Galaxy S25 series, Samsung relied entirely on Qualcomm’s flagship chip, which reportedly cost the company close to 3 trillion won.
If Samsung continues relying heavily on Qualcomm, costs are expected to rise even further. The upcoming Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro, which is likely to power the Galaxy S27 Ultra, is rumored to be built on TSMC’s more costly 2nm process. This could push manufacturing expenses even higher. In that situation, Samsung would have to either absorb the additional cost, pass it on to consumers, or increase the use of its own chips to manage expenses.
Given this context, the move toward Exynos processors is not unexpected. However, real world performance results for the Exynos 2600 have been somewhat mixed. While it performs well in certain areas, it still falls behind Snapdragon in efficiency, thermal management, and battery performance.
For the Galaxy S27 series, Samsung is reportedly targeting an even split, with around 50 percent of devices powered by Snapdragon chips and the remaining 50 percent using Exynos. This represents a significant shift and suggests growing confidence in its own silicon.
That said, there are still some risks involved. Exynos chips have faced criticism in the past, especially when compared to Snapdragon in everyday usage. Even though recent versions have shown improvements, Samsung still needs to prove consistency.
In many ways, this strategy looks like a long term adjustment. Heavy dependence on Qualcomm has proven costly, and Samsung is now trying to create a better balance between external and in house solutions.
Ultimately, the success of this approach will depend on how well the Exynos 2700 performs in real world conditions. If it delivers strong efficiency and stable performance beyond benchmarks, Samsung may finally achieve the balance it has been working toward
(via)
